Charles Dickens in his studio. |
First Edition - A Christmas Carol |
But A Christmas Carol was a
new departure, since it was the first work of his that was published in book
form, and it met with immediate commercial success (for the publisher) coming
out on December 19, and with the entire first press run having sold out by
Christmas Eve. By Christmas the following year, the book was in its thirteenth printing.
Some of these printings were clandestine and the author ended up being cut out
of the commercial chain. Dickens sued, but the publisher went bankrupt and the
writer ended up with only meager profits from the publication of what was surely
one of his most popular works. He eventually recovered some of these losses,
however, by making histrionic readings of the novella the centerpiece of well
over a hundred of his highly popular and lucrative speaking tours. Unlike many
writers who are infinitely better on paper than in person, Dickens was a
powerful public speaker and an outstanding actor, which rendered the events of these
tours exceedingly well-attended and often, especially in the author’s later
life, well paid.
Still today, A Christmas Carol
must surely hold some records for popularity of a literary work. Since its first printing in 1843, it has
never been out of print and has seen multiple adaptations for stage, screen,
musicals, animation, etc.
The mean-spirited characters, like Scrooge, whom Dickens wrote about are
often put down by critics to the melodrama and black and white
characterizations that were so often a part of literature in the Victorian Era.
But Dickens’s characters were not, in fact, black and white and even the worst
of them often demonstrated glimmers of humanity or fleetingly redeeming
qualities, despite their general and inevitable cruelty and avarice. Scrooge,
however, crosses over entirely to portray a principle in which Dickens
apparently believed strongly: the redeemability of the human spirit.
One of John Leech's color illustrations
from the first edition, when Marley's
ghost comes to call.
|
And, melodrama or no, Dickens came by his vision of public authority and
private “charity” honestly. Born into a respectable if not exactly wealthy
family, Dickens would witness how his father, John Dickens, frittered the
family’s finances away and fell into abject debt and destitution. By the time
young Charles was twelve, his father had been sentenced to debtors’ prison. The
Dickens family lost everything to their creditors and Charles was forced to
leave school, sell his books and take a job in a boot blacking factory, a typically
filthy, unhealthy industrial operation of those times, in which child labor (which
was practically child slavery) was the norm. The experience was to leave Dickens
with what one biographer referred to as a “deep personal social outrage,” while
providing the world with what was to be some of the greatest literature ever
known. His treatment at the hands of some of the many child exploiters of those
times gave Dickens a unique insight into social injustice and provided him with
much of the grist for his writer’s mill.
An illustration by Fred Bernard of Dickens as
a boy working in the boot blacking factory,
from the 1892 edition of John Foster's
"Life of Charles Dickens".
|
This is why I come back to Dickens and A Christmas Carol every year at this time, because it has never
quit being a universal story. Indeed, now more than ever in contemporary history,
we are facing a world at least as cruel as the one Dickens portrays, and seem
to have learned nothing in the last century and a half. Millions still live in
slavery, employee exploitation is rampant, once strong organized labor is on
its knees (thanks to government-corporate collusion), and every effort is being
made to sweep the poor under the rug, rob them of their benefits and leave them
for dead. Never has there been greater accumulation of wealth at the top, while
tens of millions of refugees have nowhere to go, people go hungry and live on
the street in some of the most “advanced” economies on earth, the planet is
being poisoned at an alarming rate, and people are today more hatefully divided
along political, religious and social lines than at any other time in recent
memory, and to an extent that belies unquestionable advancements made in the twentieth-century
post-World War II era.
Oddly enough, fundamental Christianity is enjoying a rebirth. But what
exactly does that mean? Simple lip service to some religious dogma? Has it been
redefined to ignore the basic teachings of its founder and namesake? And what
does the greeting “Merry Christmas” really signify, unless it’s accompanied by
a Dickensian transformation like the one that Ebenezer Scrooge underwent?
Fundamentalist Christians consistently advocate “getting Christ back
into Christmas.” But what does that signify? Whether you are a “believer” or not, the
original teachings of Christianity—and of the other monotheist religions as
well—provide a perfect guideline for secular life.
Every single doctrine of the major religions—Judaism, its offspring Christianity
and Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and so on—contains some form of the one basic
rule on which all the rest of their doctrines hinge: The Golden Rule. Do unto
others as you would have them do unto you. And that’s the not-so-hidden message
as well of A Christmas Carol. Scrooge
could only see the error of his ways when he was shown the mirror image of his
soul, and saw the face of cruelty, selfishness, disdain and indifference
reflected back at him.
In the spirit of Christmas, it’s an exercise we would all do well to
emulate, whether or not we have spirits from beyond to help us in our task, and
something we should demand, as well, of the leaders we choose to follow in all
walks of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment