Every four years, the United States of America inaugurates a new
presidency. It doesn’t matter if, as a result of free and fair elections, a
president remains in office for two terms. The winner of the November election,
no matter who he or she might be, incumbent or successful challenger, must be
sworn in to a brand new term after four years have elapsed.
Until this year, many of us Americans took this ceremony for granted,
giving no real thought to how unique a thing it is in the world. The words
“peaceful transition of power” have seemed almost as mundane to us as “have a
nice day” or “thank you for your service.” Formalities that are expected and almost
socially compulsory. But the fact that it has been happening like clockwork
every four years ever since the first president of the United States, George
Washington, rejected the idea of being an emperor and “presided” over the
federal government for the two terms that he thought prudent and then retired
after a peaceful transfer of power to John Adams, is nothing short of a miracle.
Although he established an important precedent by serving two four-year terms and no more, Washington’s reasons for leaving were political and personal—including a major rift between Jeffersonian Republicans and Hamiltonian Federalists, which was his main reason for staying for a second term, so as to act as a peacemaker in his troubled cabinet. But it seemed clear to him after two terms that his remaining in office might only deepen the divisions. And so, he withdrew his candidacy for a third term and peacefully and graciously handed over the post to the next president.
A Federalist, Adams would only serve for one term before Thomas
Jefferson was voted in to replace him. But even in these troubled early days of
the new nation—which famously led to Jefferson’s first Vice-President Aaron
Burr’s shooting and killing Hamilton in a duel—presidents were legitimately
voted into office and certified by the Electoral College, and each and every
transfer of power was prompt and peaceful, no matter what kind of bitter
political rivalries might separate the candidates. It was, in fact, Jefferson,
who had acrimoniously feuded with Washington and Hamilton, who encouraged
Washington to stay for a second term and offered to quit the government as well
if the first president didn’t remain in office. And it was Jefferson, too, who cemented the
eight-year mandate precedent that Washington set by also leaving office after
his second term and peacefully transferring power to the newly elected James
Madison, who, along with Hamilton and John Jay, had collaborated in the writing
of The Federalist Papers, which would
greatly contribute to the ratification of the nation’s Constitution.
It was thanks to the clear democratic vision of these first patriots—
who, no matter how they might disagree on the issues, agreed on the importance
of each voice being heard and each issue being debated in a climate of
democratic order—that set the guidelines and code for the future. And with each
new peaceful transfer of power, democracy, and so the nation, only grew
stronger.
This “established order” and peaceful transfer of power that we have so
taken for granted, have continued unabated throughout the two and a half
centuries of US history. Even in the most troubled and divisive of times,
indeed, even during the years before, during and after the Civil War. One
president after the other has respected the will of the people and the rules of
the Electoral College and peacefully ceded power to the next without incident,
most with extraordinary grace and an almost ritual respect for the democratic
process. A very few—John Adams, who bitterly opposed Jefferson’s Republicanism;
his son, John Quincy Adams, the sixth president, who abhorred the seventh,
Andrew Jackson; and Andrew Johnson, a
Southerner who opposed Reconstruction and hated the next president and Union
hero, Ulysses S. Grant—snubbed their successors by refusing to attend their
inaugurations. But all of them, to a man, respected the democratic process and
quietly and peacefully left office when the people and the people’s
representatives determined that their time was through.
This year’s Inauguration Day, celebrated last Wednesday, was anything but mundane. Never has an Inauguration Day been less taken for granted by a large segment of the population. Because, for the first time in history, the peaceful transfer of power came under serious and unequivocal threat. And so too did two and a half centuries of US stability and American democracy. For the first time, a president who lost a free, fair and democratic election sought to deny the results, fabricate a false narrative among a radical segment of his followers, and remain in power by inciting violence against another branch of government. In other words, for the first time, the United States has failed to have a peaceful transfer of power in keeping with our nation’s democratic norms.
Four years ago, few of us would ever have thought such a scenario was
possible. It could never happen in the United States of America, many were
convinced. That was the sort of thing that happened in unstable “third world”
countries, not in “the land of the free and the home of the brave.”
But it did, and created the biggest threat to democracy and to the
integrity of the nation since the Civil War ripped the country in two. That’s
why, when a new president was sworn in last Wednesday at high noon, I, along
with many other Americans, I’m sure, had a knot in my throat and tears in my
eyes as I watched. It was the emotion of joy that welled up in me, despite all
of my hard-earned cynicism about politics and politicians.
The tears and emotion weren’t, I realized, for the new president, no
matter how much I wish him well and hope he’ll have enormous success. Rather,
they were for democracy, tears of relief that it was still standing, though
badly battered, and clearly not out of the woods yet. My joy was that our two
and a half-century experiment in representative democracy had survived a very clear
and present threat. We had, to a much greater extent than many of us cared to
admit, dodged a bullet, stemmed an insurrection, overcome a rebellion against
the majority will, a revolt that counted on the active assistance and authority
or the passive acquiescence and silence of far too many internal players.
People we Americans have voted into office, and who failed miserably to honor
our trust that they would keep their vow to “support and defend the
Constitution of the United States.”
Lincoln's second Inauguration |
“With malice toward none, with charity for all,” he said, “with firmness
in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the
work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have
borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve
and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”
Jefferson and Adams - "difference of opinion, not principle." |
At another dire time in our history, Franklin D. Roosevelt admonished Americans in an inaugural address not to let their fate be guided by fear, another factor that has governed us for the difficult past four years. To Roosevelt’s mind, fear was of poor counsel in seeking to overcome the enormous challenges of the Depression. Solutions needed to be bold, sweeping and aimed at lifting the entire country out of crisis—advice our current politicians, who have been grudgingly doing as little as possible to tackle the current major crisis, would do well to heed. Accordingly, he said, “This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”
FDR "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." |
I am old enough to vividly recall another famous inaugural address. John
F. Kennedy was an inspiration to many Americans on both sides of the political
spectrum, but also generated rage among tribalists and white supremacists
because of his reverence for the civil rights of all Americans. His message was
one of pure patriotism and service. He basically told Americans of all walks of
life to stop asking what was in it for them when it came to defending democracy
and serving the advancement of the nation. Famously, he said, “Let the word go
forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has
been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by
war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and
unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which
this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at
home and around the world.” More specifically, he advised, “... (M)y fellow
Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for
your country.”
Our better angels... |
As we approach the next four years, after the last four which were,
unquestionably, some of the most divisive in our history, we would do well to
re-read and recall the words of all of these great leaders. But we should
particularly take to heart those of Lincoln, who is taken by many to have been
the gold standard for selfless, patriotic presidents. We should remember his
words and try to see past the divisive rhetoric and actions of the last four
years, draw a line and start a new road on which we allow ourselves to be
guided by “the better angels of our nature.”