I recently read Go Set a Watchman,
the late Southern writer Harper Lee’s second—depending on whether you believe
Rupert Murdoch’s Harper-Collins or investigative reporters at The New York Times— and last published book.
It is a work of fiction that was never meant to be published but ended up being
marketed, allegedly but perhaps not necessarily factually, to help finance care
for the elderly author, who died in February of 2016, at the age of 89. Not
unsurprisingly, it ended up being a lot more lucrative—an enormous
bestseller—for Murdoch than for Lee, who barely lived long enough to see it
published.
I remember when I first read Lee’s classic, To Kill a Mockingbird, published in 1960. It was a fairly new book
then, since it was, perhaps, 1964 or so when I read it. But it was already a
very popular novel, a book that had won the 1961 Pulitzer Prize. And in 1962,
it was made into a blockbuster movie. Fortunately, I read the book before I saw
the film. Both were good. The book was infinitely better. I have re-read it
every decade or so since then. It is, without a doubt, a literary work of art.
Mockingbird was on one of our high school reading lists. When I
read it, I remember being surprised that it was on the list. Ours was a small
conservative Ohio town, and rape, which figured as a principal element in the
plot, wasn’t the sort of subject that usually formed any part of the
curriculum. I figured my teacher knew what the book was about, but I couldn’t
imagine that the school board did. It was known and touted as a “coming of age
story”, which might have made it seem more like a book for adolescents, which
indeed it was, if for adults as well. But to me it came as a surprise to find such
a book on any reading list that could wend its way into the Wapakoneta City
Schools system.
The other thing that surprised me enormously, however, was how a lot of
my classmates got that it was also a story that delved deeply into racial
inequality, but that they couldn’t seem to see any moral or social equivalency
with our own town. Perhaps it was that the book underscored, for us, what we’d
had ingrained in our thinking from infancy—namely that the deep South was a
hotbed of racial discrimination, a place where African Americans, whom we still
called Negroes back then, were segregated from the white community and that
this segregation was upheld by local laws that went against every tenet of the
Bill of Rights. And that those laws
were in turn upheld not only by local law enforcement but also by vigilante
justice—which often overlapped.
Jem, Scout and Dill in the 1962 movie version |
It was a North-South thing for many. We were the “good Northerners” who
had stood with Abe Lincoln, freed the slaves, formed part of the Underground
Railroad and saved the Republic, and they were the “bad Southerners” who had committed
sedition, precipitated the bloodiest war in our history, and continued, right
up to the present, to discriminate against blacks—even though “we” had “whipped
the South” during the Civil War, in the name of freedom and justice.
So how was it, then, that we lived in an all-white town? Not even a single
token black in the population? Perhaps it was because our town, like so many other
small towns in the North, had long fostered a more hypocritical brand of racism
than the open segregation practiced in the South at that time. If you asked around,
many people in our community would have declared themselves “not racially
prejudiced”—they just didn’t want blacks living in our town, or going to our
schools, or attending our churches. In fact, there was an unspoken rule that it
was crucial that “the sun should never set” on a Negro in our town.
It was well-known, if a tacit truth, that the one in charge of
maintaining that rule was our chief of police, who had been chief for as long
as just about anybody could recall. And that was one of the reasons why. What
was less well known was that the Ku Klux Klan—which many of the more naïve
among us thought of as an odious Southern white supremacist vigilante
organization—was alive and well in our Ohio town. In fact, it was alive and
well in the entire area. When my father was a young boy growing up in nearby
Lima, Ohio, the KKK had held one of its most successful public rallies in the
country, drawing a crowd of more than a hundred thousand “nice white Northern people”
and choking the arteries of the downtown area of the Ohio oil-boom town.
In Wapakoneta, however, especially during the formative years of people
of my grandparents’ generation, it was more like a secret lodge, the classified
roster of which included some of the most prominent of the town’s male citizens,
who lent their support to the police chief’s anti-black crusade. But nobody
talked about it. It was only the occasional whispered reference overheard among
people of my parents’ generation that fed my curiosity.
My mother seldom mentioned race. But I recall her once saying that she
was glad to see how racially unprejudiced my sister and I were. Maybe, she
said, this was how all the hatred and ugliness would eventually be overcome—gradually,
generation by generation. Her father was an unapologetic racist whose language
was often peppered with the most hateful of terms when referring to African
Americans. She, on the other hand, was much less so. She made it clear that she
would be disappointed if any of us kids ever decided to date or marry a black
person, but that was mostly, she said, because it would make the world a lot
tougher place for us to live in, and it would surely be a burden for any
mixed-race children we had. But she went on to say that perhaps by our
children’s children’s generation, it would no longer be an issue, and that
would be a great thing—the world, she assumed, finally as God wished it.
In Mockingbird, the narrator
is a grade school girl named Jean Louise “Scout” Finch. Although she talks a
lot about growing up in a small Southern town in the 1930s, and about the
adventures she has with her older brother Jem and their friend Dill, who comes
to stay each summer with his aunt who lives next door, the main element of the
plot is the corrosive nature of racism in early-20th-century
Southern society.
Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck) defends Tom Robinson
(Brock Peters)in the 1962 movie version
|
The backdrop for this entire narrative is the ill-fated trial of Tom
Robinson, a black man falsely accused of raping a young white woman (who, in
fact, we surmise, is being abused by her father). The hero of the story is Scout’s
father, Atticus Finch, the highly principled and highly respected defense
lawyer who takes on Robinson’s case, even though it brings pressure to bear on
him from local Klansmen and from the father of the alleged rape victim. This
man, Bob Ewell, will eventually seek to harm Scout and Jem in revenge for his
and his daughter’s public humiliation in court, but the Finch kids will be
saved by the mysterious “Boo” Radley, a shadowy, frightening and almost
supernatural character in the summer fantasy world of Scout, Jem and Dill.
Despite all evidence to the contrary, and in spite of Atticus Finch’s
best efforts, the jury ends up convicting Tom Robinson. The point and the
lesson that the book proffers is that the racist nature of the white
supremacist society in the South of the early part of the 20th
century places all odds against Tom Robinson. He cannot get a fair trial in
Southern white society. Finch’s attempt to prove him innocent is a quixotic
fool’s errand that only such a principled man as he would take on.
Author Harper Lee with Mary Badham who played Scout
in the film version of Mockingbird
|
It is disturbing, then, to read Go
Set a Watchman, since the Atticus Finch whom we have raised, like Scout and
Jem in Mockingbird, to the status of
mythical hero, here is portrayed as a flawed character who disappoints his now
grown-up daughter (and us) by demonstrating that he too views blacks as
inferior to whites and by joining other local movers and shakers in resisting
the interference in Southern society of federal lawmakers and of the NAACP.
In Watchman, Scout in now Miss
Jean Louise, a sophisticated 26-year-old woman who makes her home in New York
City. She is back in her home town of Maycomb, Alabama, for a visit. Her
father, Atticus, is now an aging town icon, plagued by arthritis, but still
practicing law, although now with the assistance of Henry Clinton, Jean Louise’s
childhood friend, later boyfriend and now suitor. Henry has taken Atticus as
his mentor and plans eventually to take over the Finch law office. He hopes it
will be with Jean Louise as his wife.
In this “new” book, Dill is but a faded memory and Jem has long since
dropped dead from a heart attack. But while these characters have been cruelly
erased from the scene—for those of us who loved them almost as much as we loved
Scout—a new and colorful character is introduced: Atticus’s brother, Jack, an
eccentric doctor who has a cynical view of the world and takes comfort in his
huge collection of books. It is Jack to whom Jean Louise will resort when her
world appears to be coming apart at the seams later in the book.
And then too, there is Alexandra, Atticus and Jack’s sister, who has
been living with Atticus and caring for him ever since Jem’s death—her husband
having long since “moved to the fishing camp”, where he won’t have to put up
with her overbearing personality any more.
Harper Lee in her latter years |
Alexandra has sent home another beloved character from Mockingbird, Calpurnia, the black maid
who was practically a mother to the Finch children after their own mother died.
For Jean Louise, Calpurnia was everything, disciplinarian, counselor, friend,
mother. She misses Calpurnia terribly and finds her aunt a poor replacement.
Opinionated, meddling, unbearably pious, as well as a gossip, Alexandra is the
complete opposite of Jean Louise and as such, they clash constantly. Alexandra is
furious when she finds out that Jean Louise has visited Calpurnia. To her mind,
Negroes have always been treated well in Maycomb, but now have grown uppity, at
the prompting of the NAACP, and should be ignored for their ingratitude.
Calpurnia, for her part, receives Jean Louise coolly, and speaks to her
with the practiced manner that Scout recognizes as the talk blacks reserve “for
company”. She is devastated. It’s like being given the cold shoulder by her own
mother.
But there’s something deeper going on here. Zeebo, a relative of Calpurnia’s,
has been involved in an auto accident in which he was speeding and a white
person was killed. Atticus has decided he will defend Zeebo. But this time, his
motives are not as noble as those invoked when he defended Tom Robinson. This
time he has taken on the pro bono job to prevent the NAACP from sending in a
lawyer of their own and turning the trial into what the people of Maycomb see
as a potential media circus and unwanted interference in the town’s race
relations.
Jean Louise ends up spying from the empty “colored balcony” of the county
courthouse on a private meeting of Maycomb movers and shakers in which both
Atticus and Henry are present and active, and in which all manner of racist
statements are tolerated by them both. She becomes, literally, physically ill
and has to leave the place.
The rest of the book is about her struggle with these new and hurtful
feelings and how her liberal Uncle Jack helps her to come to grips with them.
She feels as if she has gone insane. She and her aunt are at loggerheads, her
beloved Calpurnia treats her like a stranger, Henry, she is now convinced, is a
racist with whom she can have nothing more to do, and Atticus has betrayed every
moral tenet in which she was brought up to believe. She begins to wonder if
perhaps she hasn’t truly gone mad, because it seems impossible to her that she
has suddenly been dropped into a bizzaro world in which everything is the
opposite of what it should be.
It is her Uncle Jack who eventually convinces Jean Louise that her
father is no racist, that he is simply working from the inside to change minds
and customs little by little. A sort of if-you-can’t-beat-‘em-join-‘em approach
it would seem. I was immediately reminded of my own mother’s description of how
each generation might become less and less racist. I wasn’t terribly convinced
of that then, and although Jean Louise eventually takes her uncle’s explanation
as valid and forgives her father, I’m still not very convinced of it now. Nor did
I come away from this story feeling that working in the midst of, and as part
of, a corrupt, bigoted and unjust system so as to “improve it little by little
from the inside,” or at least to mitigate somewhat the evil it engenders, was
in any way a strategy bound for success.
The controversy about Watchman
that has rocked the literary world has to do with whether it was a second book
by Harper Lee or if it was an earlier draft of Mockingbird, which editors at the writer’s original publishing
company, J.B. Lippincott, convinced her to re-write with a more upbeat message.
Indeed, the writing in Watchman is a
starker, less meticulous example of the author’s enormous talent, if still a
compelling and well-written book. The charge is that Lee’s attorney, Tonja
Carter, waited for the writer’s sister and long-time protector, Alice, to die
so that she could take the manuscript of Watchman
to Murdoch’s Harper Collins where it was seen as the money-grab of the decade.
Although Carter fought to keep the contents of Lee’s will a secret, a suit
filed by The New York Times
eventually forced her to make the contents of the will public. The will named
Carter the sole executor of Lee’s estate.
Beyond the controversy about whether Harper Lee wrote Go Set a Watchman before or after she
wrote To Kill a Mockingbird, perhaps its
message, like the one my mother imparted on me all those decades ago, is that
no matter how much laws might change in the search for justice and equality,
social change, unfortunately, takes a lot longer and can’t be legislated. It
takes each generation becoming ever more moderate, ever more liberal, ever more
tolerant of diversity and intolerant of racial prejudice. And perhaps that’s
the greatest danger of the kind of fundamentalist times in which we’re living right
now, when the new normal seems to be, one step forward and two back.